 |
| Product Awards |
 |
 |
Kyocera Mita received high productivity ratings from
BERTL subscribers. |
A Kyocera user wrote, “Having three different print
PDLs in the same driver lets my people use the
print driver that best matches their work. Some
design projects run better in PostScript and others
seem to work better in PCL printing. Although I
never actually sat and timed the devices, the 40
people in my office say the Kyocera devices are
more productive than any other MFP in the office. If
my people are happy, my job is easier, so Kyocera
has my vote.”
— General Administrator for a tool and die manufacturer |
A digital imaging device’s productivity impacts directly on the
productivity of the entire office. Productivity is about much
more than just “speeds and feeds” – it’s about keeping the
entire workflow process running smoothly and efficiently,
resulting in savings of time, and therefore, money.
“The number of productivity factors is mind-boggling,“
wrote one subscriber, an office manager with 27 printers
and 9 MFPs on his network. “To rubber-stamp a product as
being more productive than another based on a few simple
copy speeds seems ridiculous. There’s so much more to it
than that.”
Generally, users assess the productivity of a device as
being the amount of time they have to dedicate to carrying
out a task. In theory, productivity can be compared by
running the same job on several different devices, then
seeing which one finishes first. However, in practice,
productivity is often harder to judge.
For example: say MFP device A prints a Word document 10
seconds faster than MFP device B. However, MFP device B
can send an email to users, telling them when their jobs |
|
are finished rather than leaving them to guess. MFP B can
also be equipped with mail bins, whereas device A outputs
jobs into a general output stack, where users have to
search to find their jobs.
Which of the two devices described above is a more
productive printer for the user?
Headline specifications can be misleading compared to the
bigger picture when the user is placed at the center of the
equation. To get a feel for what devices are most
productive in actual, real-world environments, BERTL
asked users from across the world to tell us which device
they feel delivers the most productivity.
ABOUT THE WINNER:
Kyocera Mita is part of the Kyocera Group, which has more
than 57,000 employees throughout the world. The company
is mainly an office equipment specialist, interested in the
development of copiers, multifunctional devices, printer, fax
products and software/network solutions. The company
focuses on low-to-mid range volume areas of the business
market and has a sturdy, high-volume product range
available as well. Kyocera Mita's concern for environmental
issues shows in the design of many of its machines. The
company's Ecosys (Economy, Ecology and Systems) Printers
have eliminated disposable print cartridges to reduce
industrial waste.
ABOUT THE AWARDS:
The Readers’ Choice Awards are the cumulative findings
culled from thousands of BERTL surveys. Unlike other
industry awards which are chosen by a small group of
industry pundits, BERTL Readers’ Choice Awards are
decided by our readers the most experienced, technically
savvy and discerning digital imaging equipment buyers and
users in the world. |
|
|
© BERTL, Inc. WARNING: This material is copyrighted by BERTL, Inc. and is the sole property of BERTL. Duplication of this proprietary material or excerpts in any manner, whether
printed or electronic (including but not limited to copying, faxing, scanning or use on a fax-back system), is illegal and strictly prohibited without written permission from BERTL. Violators
will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. To purchase reprints of any BERTL report or article, contact BERTL at 1 (732) 761-2311. BERTL, Inc., 300 Craig Road, Manalapan, NJ
07726. Contact us at sales@BERTL.com. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|